Top latest Five h4831sc load data Urban news
Top latest Five h4831sc load data Urban news
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I actually need to find a bullet inside the one hundred sixty course that my older rifle likes.
H4831 will perform from the Swift but not serious perfectly. You'll by no means obtain the pressures you require for consistency Using the .223. 760, or H414 are going to be far better but for some purpose I ain't the most significant admirer of most ball powders.
WARNING: This product can expose you to guide, which is thought to the Condition of California to bring about cancer and start defects or other reproductive harm. For more info head to – .
Sweet!! I am going to decide some up and provides it a check out. Thank you guys, I enjoy it! I will Enable you to know very well what I find out. I do have a couple of 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to test that first and find out what happens.
IMR powders also preform very well for me with a person notable exception. Every one of the chrongraphing I've finished with them suggests the velecity is consistant earlier mentioned 32 levels but starts to range after the temp starts to drop. The nearer to zero I get the more they vary. I have seen about 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 during the Winter season time close to in this article. Have not seen this h4831sc with a lot of the other powders.
Any load data to help that? My first considered is it's actually not likely to burn off all of the way and velocities are going to be slow and far and wide. Could be a nice fireworks Display screen!
You might have for making several extra posts to acquire cleared to do PM's. As soon as you reach that position I'd submit during the categorized reloading section to view if anyone is in your area for a trade.
and you may want to spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry h4831 vs h4831sc can does modify over the years. 4831 powder of decades in the past isn't exact as what on earth is available. which is why someone serious about reloading safely and securely can have h4831 vs h4831sc quite possibly the most recent load data books to seek advice from.
WA I'd personally advocate a slower burner that can give better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you are loading heavies long.
It is really funny how over time loading countless various cartridges in many different rifles that I have never received appropriate end final results with H-4831 or maybe the short-Lower Model.
As for that 4831 vs 4831SC, They may be exactly the same/equivalent powder cept for grain dimensions. Load data is interchangeable.
The "SC" stands for Quick Reduce. I have not recognized a distinction between either powder dut I don't Imagine I might combine them.
Both of those hold the Similar burn rate, brief Minimize comes in handy If you're at max fill rather than at strain/velocity that you want you can find far more shortcut inside a circumstance.
This looks like an excellent place to disclose a bit more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 specially...I when experienced a pound of H4831SC sit to the shelf for several years. It had been bought right before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Extreme" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a component.